Instead, the Senate should recognize that, if we want to promote a new global norm against chemical warfare, it would be nolesseffective but far more responsible, safer, and certainly cheaper to do so via hortatory United Nations Security Council resolutions rather than by means of fatally flawed arms control agreements.
And therein lies what may be the most important fact about the new bomber: if enemies fear they have noeffective defenses against it, then they will be less inclined to start a war in the first place.