Now the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that a Pennsylvania judge was correct in allowing jurors to consider that evidence. (Thanks Abnormal Use for the tip.) The decision is interesting because it discusses not only the logical tension embedded in much modern products-liability law but the intellectual calisthenics federal judges must engage in when hearing a case based on state tort law.

FORBES: Jurors Can Hear Evidence Bike Helmet Met Standards, Court Rules

This turn of events is the logical flipside of Parliament's abject refusal to amend Britain's outrageous universal jurisdiction law.

CENTERFORSECURITYPOLICY: Standing down the hanging jury