-
In the ruling, Weeks found that not only did prosecutors across the state intentionally use the race of a potential juror as a significant factor in decisions to exercise preemptory challenges -- the practice of striking somebody from a jury without explanation, but that the practice occurred in Robinson's case.
CNN: SHARE THIS
-
The larger point of this exercise was to clarify and examine each individual argument against the practice.
ECONOMIST: A federal court overturns a Californian ban on gay marriage
-
In theory, these days are the opportunity for the Commons to exercise its core responsibility to monitor the use of public money - in practice, they're debates on issues raised by select committee reports.
BBC: Week ahead
-
In that case the practice of letting a jury decide whether a warning is complete is an exercise in futility, an argument about a hypothetical.
FORBES: Three Thousand Words Of Warnings Not Enough