-
The White House is promoting the controversial Clear Skies Act of 2003, which the Environmental Protection Agency claims will provide health benefits cheaper, faster and more reliably than the current Clean Air Act.
CNN: Challenges ahead for a changing Earth
-
Economists sigh that she ordered the Environmental Protection Agency not to weigh costs against benefits in enforcing certain provisions of the Clean Water Act.
ECONOMIST: Barack Obama's Supreme Court choice
-
Yet now a federal court has ruled the Environmental Protection Agency is illegally giving the lobby extra benefits that Congress never intended.
WSJ: Review & Outlook: Zero Dark Ethanol