The IRS leaned on the long-held premise that a shareholder investment must contain an actual economic outlay that leaves him poorer in an economic sense.
While different sectors can be in competition over water, it is clear that all the benefits of water are required for sustainable economic development, and therefore green policy should be based on the premise that water unpins the entire green process.
The second premise, that carbon restrictions are necessary for energy consumption control, belies inherent logic of free market economic incentives to advance conservation economies.