Given the hazard of joint and several liability and the fact that filing jointly is an irrevocable election, I really think the defaultassumption should be separate filing.
Their assumption seems to be that a real default (and along with it a triggering of the credit default clauses in all those CDS contracts) would be a bad thing for the banks and thus a credible threat to get them to line up for the voluntary version.
You can work out default expectations by looking at the spreads on speculative bonds and making an assumption about the amount investors will recover from companies that fail to pay up in full.