As the whole point of Quantitative Easing and the government stimulus was to raise output and employment (because, for those who have not noticed, we have almost 14 million citizens looking for work), there is no reason to maintain the assumption of zero change in the quantity of goods.

FORBES: The Real Impact of Quantitative Easing (Next to Nothing!)

First off, it assumes zero change in the quantity of goods.

FORBES: The Real Impact of Quantitative Easing (Next to Nothing!)

Population growth, urbanisation and climate change are putting stress on the quantity and quality of water supplies, a concern for businesses that rely on water.

ECONOMIST: 2012 in focus

But despite this, knowledge about the impact of climate change on groundwater quantity and quality is limited.

UNESCO: THEMES

The fact that a 21 percent increase in the value of the Yuan was met with a 38.7 percent increase in import value means that the quantity of Chinese imports demanded increased by nearly 15 percent after the price change.

FORBES: Economists Ignore the Facts in Supporting Chinese Currency Legislation

If we were to, for example, double the money supply but also double the quantity of goods, then there would be no price change at all.

FORBES: The Real Impact of Quantitative Easing (Next to Nothing!)