-
The real loser in that election, Justice John Paul Stevens said in his dissent in Bush v.
NEWYORKER: Benched
-
But, because the Democrats recognized that a transparent reprise of Bush v.
CENTERFORSECURITYPOLICY: Bush v. Kerry II
-
The U.S. Supreme Court may even decide not to rule at all on the case George W. Bush brought before them, Bush v.
CNN: May It Please The Court
-
She sided with her conservative colleagues in the Bush v.
CNN: A sensible justice
-
This could send a signal that, Bush v Gore notwithstanding, the justices still consider that state election disputes are not a matter for the highest court in the land.
ECONOMIST: Curse of the hanging chads | The
-
And in 2000, in Bush v Gore, he voted to allow the election recount to continue while the majority ruled that it should end, and that George Bush should be president.
ECONOMIST: The Supreme Court
-
Bush v Gore: The Court Cases and the Commentary.
ECONOMIST: There is still much to learn from the dead heat of 2000
-
The five conservative justices who were in the majority in Bush v Gore might see it as a chance to rebuke the three judges from the Ninth Circuit, which is decidedly liberal and is said to have more of its rulings overturned than any other federal circuit.
ECONOMIST: Curse of the hanging chads | The
-
As members of this Committee are well aware, the Bush Administration has decided to abandon the V-22 tiltrotor program.
CENTERFORSECURITYPOLICY: Center for Security Policy | Can The United States Afford Not To Dominate The Tiltrotor Aerospace Market?