In fact, one could only draw this conclusion by assuming that the soldiers reading this ATTP will choose to do the exact opposite of what the ATTP says.
No member of the military will think this is the only piece of guidance for them to follow, and certainly no commander will rely on this ATTP over legal advice.
Here, I think Mr. Horowitz again begins with a presumption that law of armed conflict awareness is not part of the military ethos because it is not comprehensively addressed in this ATTP.
The ATTP then goes on in Paragraphs 1-5 through 1-11 to explain the requirements of the law of armed conflict, the principle of military necessity, the principle of distinction, the principle of proportionality, and the principle of humanity.