追溯语言学研究中“语言”与“言语”二分的历史渊源，对传统结构主义语言学重“语言”而轻“言语”的研究范式和后来的语用学派对这种范式的反拨分别进行述评。
After a review of the history of the dichotomy of "language" and "parole" in the study of language, this article criticizes the research paradigm of structuralists and that of pragmaticists.
本文在追溯了语言学研究中“语言”与“言语”二分的历史渊源之后，对传统结构主义语言学重“语言”而轻“言语”的研究范式和后来的语用学派对这种范式的反拨分别进行了述评。
After a review of the history of the dichotomy of "langue" and "parole" in the study of language, this article criticizes the research paradigm of structuralists and that of pragmaticists.
在当代语用学格局中，“英美学派”更多地聚焦于指示语、会话含义、预设、言语行为和话语结构等具体论题的研究；
In contemporary pragmatics, the Anglo-American school focuses only on concrete issues, such as deixis, conversational implicature, presupposition, speech acts and conversational structure;
本文从功能主义学派的观点出发，运用语用原则，从人类交际的角度，试图对标记现象进行一些初步的解释。
Based on the school of functionalism, this paper attempts to make a preliminary explanation to the marks. The explanation accords with pragmatic principles and the focus on human communication.
本文从功能主义学派的观点出发，运用语用原则，从人类交际的角度，试图对标记现象进行一些初步的解释。
Based on the school of functionalism, this paper attempts to make a preliminary explanation to the marks. The explanation accords with pragmatic principles and the focus on human communication.
应用推荐