本文在前人研究的基础上，从语义学和语用学的角度来探求法律语言的模糊现象。
This thesis, based on the previous studies, explores the vagueness in legal language from a semantic and pragmatic perspective.
在本文中，作者从语义学和语用学角度对法律语言中模糊的成因和作用进行了全面的分析。
In this thesis, the author gives a comprehensive analysis of the causes of vagueness and its functions in legal language from semantic and pragmatic perspectives.
对喻体所作的语义学和语用学研究表明：人类的共同本性、特征和知识决定了人们在使用喻体时具有共同理念和审美取向。
A semantic and pragmatic research into the vehicle reveals that the similarity of human notions and aesthetic orientation derives from the similarity of human nature, characteristics and knowledge.
语用学为语言学研究开辟了一个崭新的领域，为解决一些原来句法学和语义学难以解释的问题找到了突破口。
Pragmatics has set up a brand new area for linguistic research and found a breach for some thorny problems emerged in syntax and semantics.
将论证理解为语义学概念还是语用学(辩证的)概念是非形式逻辑和经典逻辑的分水岭。
Understanding argument as a semantic conception or as pragmatic conception is the watershed between informal logic and classical logic.
语用学有时与语义学相对，语义学研究意义时不考虑使用者和句子的交际功能。
Pragmatics is sometimes contrasted with Semantics, which deals with meaning without reference to the users and communicative functions of sentences.
语用学和语义学都是对意义的语言学研究，但两者是不同的。
Pragmatics and semantics are both linguistic studies of meaning, but they are different.
作者队为，以现代语言哲学为导引，结合语义学与语用学的研究成果，可以全面和深刻地把握意义的本质。
The author thinks, guided by modern language philosophy and with achievements of semantics and pragmatics, we are able to grasp the essence of meaning soundly.
本文将语用推理理论和意义的语境理论运用到翻译理论的研究之中，旨在对语用学、语义学和翻译学的学科交叉研究进行尝试性探讨。
The paper centers on the application of the theory of pragmatic presupposition and that of context of situation in the theoretical study of translation.
语用学和语义学两者都是对意义的研究，它们根本的区别在于语义学研究的语言的抽象意义，语用学研究的是交际过程中语言意义的表达和理解。
The basic difference between pragmatics and traditional semantics is that pragmatics considers meaning in context and traditionally semantics studies meaning in isolation from the context of use.
语用学和语义学两者都是对意义的研究，它们根本的区别在于语义学研究的语言的抽象意义，语用学研究的是交际过程中语言意义的表达和理解。
The basic difference between pragmatics and traditional semantics is that pragmatics considers meaning in context and traditionally semantics studies meaning in isolation from the context of use.
应用推荐