《理想国》由柏拉图大约于西元前三百八十年左右，以苏格拉底对话式而成的一本巨作，内容是关于正义及秩序。
The Republic is a Socratic dialogue written by Plato around 380 BC concerning the definition of justice and the order.
另一方面来说，《克里托篇》则是一场,介于苏格拉底与单一个体之间的对话，就只有一人。
The Crito, on the other hand, is a conversation between Socrates and a single individual, only one person.
那是苏格拉底开始这场对话的方式，或说是柏拉图让苏格拉底开始的方式。
That's the way Socrates begins this dialogue, or that's the way Plato has Socrates begin it.
苏格拉底如此解译德尔菲神谕，至少是为了要能够，和其它人进行哲学对话。
The Delphic Oracle is interpreted by Socrates at least to command engaging with others in philosophical conversation.
克里托篇的命名源自，苏格拉底的一名朋友及信徒，在对话之初，就诚心守护着他的这位良师益友。
Crito is named for a friend and disciple of Socrates who at the outset of the dialogue is sitting as a watchful guardian over his mentor.
所以这部对话录的核心，是由一系列的讨论组成的，其中苏格拉底试图摆出他的原因，让人相信灵魂是不朽的。
And so the heart of the dialogue consists of a series of arguments in which Socrates attempts to lay out his reasons for believing in the immortality of the soul.
通过了解那些由苏格拉底提出，但他自己也觉得不充分的观点，我们可以更好地理解这些对话作品。
We can often better understand the dialogues by seeing Socrates as putting forward certain positions that he does not think are altogether adequate.
在对话的一开始，我们读到苏格拉底和他的朋友。
At the very beginning of the dialogue, Glaucon we see Socrates and his friend Glaucon.
注意看苏格拉底,操控对话的技巧。
Note the way Socrates manipulates the dialogue, the conversation.
书中有一章睿智而幽默，他想像苏格拉底在梦中与赫尔墨斯进行了对话。
A chapter in which he imagines a dialogue that Socrates might have had with Hermes during a dream is both amusing and insightful.
因此医学院没有苏格拉底式的对话也就不足为奇了。
We should not be surprised there is no Socratic dialogue with Hippocrates.
我们要学习的这篇对话，斐多篇，就将场景设定在苏格拉底临死前的一幕。
The particular dialogue that we're going to reading, the Phaedo, is set at the death scene of Socrates.
哲学及苏格拉底式的哲学，需要朋友，同伴及对话。
Philosophy and certainly Socratic philosophy requires friends, comrades, conversations.
但是这种快速录入如此大量的书目已经显现出来了一些问题，不仅仅是这个甚至出现在了柏拉图经典书籍《对苏格拉底的审判和死亡——四个对话》上的粉色手指的广为流传的问题。
But the speedy input of so many titles has thrown up several glitches, not least the scattering of pink fingers in classics including Plato's the Trial and Death of Socrates.
从古希腊、古罗马到德国古典美学时期，从苏格拉底、柏拉图到黑格尔、费尔巴哈，他们的观点或理论都有对对话的隐约触及。
From ancient Greece, ancient Rome to the German and classic esthetics period, and from Socrates, Plato to Hegel, Feuerbach, the viewpoints or theories have some relation of the dialogue.
这恰恰与苏格拉底在预言者的同名对话中同欧雪弗洛说得正好相反。
This is exactly the opposite of what Socrates says to Euthyphro in the soothsayer's namesake dialogue.
苏格拉底和希庇阿斯的一场问答预示了西方美学和中国美学对话的不可能性与可能性。
The quarrel foreboded the impossibility and the possibility of the dialogue between western Aesthetics and Chinese Aesthetics .
他在对话录中采用的形式就是苏格拉底教学时所采用的、被后世称为“苏格拉底法”的问答式。
He adopted the dialogue form used by Socrates; the latter's teaching was done by question and answer and the method has become known as the "Socratic method".
他在对话录中采用的形式就是苏格拉底教学时所采用的、被后世称为“苏格拉底法”的问答式。
He adopted the Dialogue form used by Socrates; the latter's teaching was done by question and answer, and the method has become known as the "Socratic method".
那场为法律所讲，有关法律的对话，真的是要为克里托排解，而不是苏格拉底，最深层意见的表述，尤其是那些问题攸关义务与服从？
Is that speech for the law, with the laws, really intended for the benefit of Crito, rather than an expression? Of Socrates' deepest opinions about the questions of obligation and obedience?
苏格拉底的哲学是在城邦广场的对话交流中产生的。
The philosophy of Socrates was developed in discourses in the city square.
苏格拉底是古希腊最著名的哲学家，他对柏拉图的教导，记录在他们的对话录里。
Socrates was one of the most famous Greek philosophers, whose teaching Plato reported in his dialogues.
学者们是如此鉴别的，柏拉图早期对话作品， 即，在所谓的苏格拉底的对话中，主角苏格拉底的观点，与历史上那个真实的苏格拉底的思想吻合。
Scholars distinguish between the early Platonic dialogues, the so-called Socratic dialogues, where the thought is, those are the views of Socrates, the actual historical figure.
因为没有和柏拉图别的对话一样我们没有能得以目睹实际的询问，所以我们不应该拒绝认为(EA2)是一种在TheApology中苏格拉底对于智慧的观点的解释。
Since we do not get to witness the actual questioning as we do in Plato's other dialogues, we should not reject (EA2) as an interpretation of Socrates' view of wisdom in the Apology.
因为没有和柏拉图别的对话一样我们没有能得以目睹实际的询问，所以我们不应该拒绝认为(EA2)是一种在TheApology中苏格拉底对于智慧的观点的解释。
Since we do not get to witness the actual questioning as we do in Plato's other dialogues, we should not reject (EA2) as an interpretation of Socrates' view of wisdom in the Apology.
应用推荐