航海过失免责是很有特色的承运人过失免责事由之一。
Exception of Nautical Fault is characteristic of carriers liability system.
当今时代，废除航海过失免责已成为不可逆转的国际潮流。
Nowadays, abolition of nautical fault exemption has become an irreversible international trend.
通过理论分析把握航海过失负责的实质，对我国“航海过失免责”条款的存废提出建议。
This essay attempts to hold essence through theory analyses, put forward the suggestion on the countermeasure of our country in the near future.
“国际海上货物运输法的强制性”与“航海过失免责”两者之间应是动态的“从属”关系。
The relation between mandatory feature of nautical law and nautical fault exemption ought to be dynamic subordination.
航海过失免责的沿革，集中反映了承运人对其所承运的货物应承担的责任的归责原则或者基础。
The evolution of the nautical fault exemption reflected the rule principle or the basis of the responsibility of the carrier for the cargoes carried.
在国际海事委员会制定运输法草案的过程中，各国代表团对是否应该取消航海过失免责的意见并不统一。
The opinions on whether the nautical fault exemption should be eliminated from every delegation were disunion during drafting the draft Instrument on Transport Law by CMI.
第三章具体分析了完全过失原则、航海过失免责和举证责任分配问题，并认为在承运人责任制度中确立完全过失原则、取消航海过失免责规定是符合效率价值的。
Naturally in the third chapter the principle of complete fault liability, the cancellation of exception of nautical fault and the allocation of burden of proof are discussed in detail.
第三章具体分析了完全过失原则、航海过失免责和举证责任分配问题，并认为在承运人责任制度中确立完全过失原则、取消航海过失免责规定是符合效率价值的。
Naturally in the third chapter the principle of complete fault liability, the cancellation of exception of nautical fault and the allocation of burden of proof are discussed in detail.
应用推荐