第三部分是原因自由行为的特征。
The third part is the character of the action libera in cause.
一个自由行为者的选择能否必然实现呢？
原因自由行为，亦称作原因中的自由行为，是大陆法系中的概念。
The term of "Actio libera in cause" was originated in continental law system.
从表面上看，这些行为带有理智的、有目的的、自由行为的所有标记。
On the surface, it bears all the marks of intelligent, purposeful, and free action.
理论界为解决原因自由行为的可罚性，提出了很多观点，但每种观点均有缺陷。
The theories field puts forward a lot of standpoints for solving the punishability of action libera in cause, but each standpoint contains blemish.
在我国，原因自由行为理论的诸多方面还存在着争议和疑问，远没有达成共识。
In China, there has been so much controversy and doubt in many aspects of actio libera in causa theory that a common understanding has not been reached.
文章的第一部分界定了原因自由行为的概念，厘清了原因自由行为与醉酒的关系。
The first part of the paper firstly defines the concept of actio libera in cause, then clarifies the relationship between actio libera in cause and crime by intoxicated person.
本文试图从行为概念出发，解释原因自由行为，阐明原因自由行为可罚性的理论依据。
This paper tries to set out from the behavior concept, to explain the action libera in cause and clarify the theoretical base of action libera in cause to be punished.
原因自由行为理论是西方一个颇具争论的问题，它对传统刑法理论原则具有补充和完善的作用。
The theory of the free behavior by reason is a very controversial problem in the western legal field.
恰恰是由于自由行为有着反照主体(intransitive)的特性，它能塑造或决定一个人的品格。
It is free ACTS, precisely due to their intransitive character, that can sculpt or determine a person's moral standing.
本文以“责任能力与实行行为同时存在”这一传统刑法原则为线索对原因自由行为理论进行探讨。
The authors explore the theory of action liberal in cause with traditional principle of criminal law the capacity for responsibity coexist with the action as its cue.
原因自由行为是指故意或过失使自己置于无责任能力状态，然后在无责任能力状态下导致构成要件的实现。
Actio libera in cause "means a state, caused by the behavior himself with intent or by negligence, in which he without legal competence has committed an act that satisfies the constitution of crime."
为了协调这一矛盾，众学者早已提出了诸多观点，本文也不胜冒昧，意就原因自由行为的可罚性问题呈一己之见。
In order to coordinate this contradiction, many scholars have already put forward a great deal of views. Being bold very much, this paper want to present one's own views on this problem.
本章主要谈的是隔离犯、不作为犯、原因自由行为、间接正犯、共谋共同正犯、复行为犯等特殊犯罪类型的“着手”。
This part mainly discussed segregating offense, omissions, causes freedoms, indirect perpetrator, co-perpetrator, double behavioral offense, and other special types of ACTS.
原因自由行为是行为人故意或过失使自己陷于无责任能力或限制责任能力状态而在此状态下充足犯罪构成要件的犯罪行为。
The action libera in cause is a crime that a behavior intentionally or faultily makes himself into no legal competence or limit legal competence and satisfies the constitution of crime under thereof.
因而有必要对原因自由行为的理论依据、主体范围、罪过形式等问题进行分析，说明原因自由行为理论在我国刑法中的相关适用。
This article aims to explain the basis, subject scope, culpability of this theory, and demonstrates its possible applicability to the criminal law of China.
真福若望保禄二世在《行动者》(TheActingPerson)一书中向我们揭示出，人是通过自由行为来实现自己、表达自己。
In his book the Acting person, Blessed John Paul II has shown that persons realize and communicate themselves through their free ACTS.
这是一个人们为自己的行为承担责任的自由社会。
It is a free society where people accept responsibility for their actions.
我们需要新闻自由来约束政府的越轨行为。
当学生们自由地模仿微笑时，他们的判断不受售货员行为的影响。
When the students were free to mimic the smiles, their judgments were not affected by what the salesclerk was doing.
行政主体在作出行政行为时，依法享有一定范围内的自由裁量权。
As we know, when administrative main subject take some actions, it legally enjoys free verdictive right in given scope.
尽管有我们潜意识的行为模式，我们可以在这些限制的信仰和倾向自由。
Despite our subconscious behavior patterns, we can free ourselves from these limiting beliefs and tendencies.
所以，问题来了：你想要哪样？幸福还是自由？你的行为决定了这个国家的命运。
So, the question remains: what would you rather be: happy, or free? Your actions will decide the fate of the country.
给你的孩子自由，又说“但是，这些行为是要被惩罚的”，这看起来很虚伪。
It seems hypocritical to give your kids freedom, and then say "However, these actions are punishable".
另一方面，道德自由——行为缺乏约束——就不会带来幸福。
On the other hand, moral freedom -- a lack of constraints on behavior -- does not.
这些实验不是第一次检验自由意志(或别的)信念是如何影响我们行为的。
These experiments aren't the first to examine how a belief in free will (or otherwise) affects our behaviour.
他们应当有免于饥饿和干渴，免于不安和痛苦，免于伤害和疾病的自由；也有表现正常行为并且不受恐惧和焦虑困扰自在生活的自由。
Among these are freedom from hunger and thirst, discomfort, pain, injury, and disease; and freedom to express normal behavior and to live free from fear and distress.
曼宁的决定不是因为“发脾气”——这是2010年对正义和自由最令人钦佩的行为之一。
Manning's decision was no "tantrum" - it was one of the most admirable stands for justice and freedom of 2010.
我们总是认为行为完全是由自由意志所支配。
我们总是认为行为完全是由自由意志所支配。
应用推荐