一组对照组的病人被分到针灸治疗的等候名单里。
A control group of patients was put on a waiting list for acupuncture treatment.
干预组针对接触该组所有儿童的家人开展伊维菌素治疗，对照组则没有针对任何儿童的家人开展此类治疗。
In the intervention group, all of the children's family members who lived in the household were treated with ivermectin; in the control group, no family member was treated.
选择静脉滴注单硝酸异山梨酯注射液发生头痛的冠心病患者70例，随机分为治疗组和对照组各35例。
Methods intravenous isosorbide mononitrate injection headache in patients with coronary heart disease, 70 cases were randomly divided into treatment group and control group of 35 patients.
方法：将85例2型糖尿病合并血脂异常患者随机分为治疗组57例和对照组28例。
Methods: 85 cases of type 2 DM complicated with blood - lipid disorder were allocated to treatment group (57 cases) and control group (28 cases) randomly.
方法：将符合诊断标准的冠心病心绞痛患者230例随机分为两组，对照组110例，治疗组120例。
Methods 230 patients who meet the diagnostic criteria were randomly divided into two groups, 110 cases in control group, 120 cases in therapy group.
治疗组采用针刺、推拿疗法；对照组口服西药恩密达。
The treatment group were treated by acupuncture and massage therapy, and the control group by smecta.
同时，治疗组的小鼠生存质量高于对照组。
The treating group had better survival quality than the control group as well.
方法：将58例患者随机分为治疗组和对照组。
Methods: 58 patients were randomly divided into treatment and control groups.
一组不经治疗作为对照组。
方法选70例COPD患者随机分为营养治疗组和对照组。
Methods 70 cases of election COPD patients were randomly divided into nutritional treatment group and controlled group.
方法：将符合诊断标准的CRF患者100例，随机分成两组，治疗组和对照组各50例。
Methods: 100 cases of CRF were randomly divided into treatment group and control, with 50 cases in each group.
方法：将98例SARS患者分为激素治疗组和对照组，激素治疗组57例，对照组41例。
Method: 98 SARS cases were treated with or without corticosteroids, that is, divided into treatment group(57 cases) and control group(41).
治疗组治愈率80%与对照组有显著差异（P<0.01）。
方法：采用随机单盲设计，将160例急性脑梗塞患者随机分为治疗组和对照组各80例。
Method: Random and single blind design was used to divide 160 patients with acute cerebral infarction into the treatment group (80 cases) and the control group (80 cases).
治疗组治疗后神经功能缺损评分明显低于对照组。
The neurologic impairment scores of treatment group were lower than that of control group.
结果治疗后营养治疗组较对照组肺功能有明显好转（P<0.05）。
Results Comparing with the compared group, the lung function of nutritional treatment group were improved markedly (P<0.05).
经统计学处理治疗组与对照组对比，疗效显著。
The short-term of the treatment was marked compared with the controls.
患者接受HBO治疗交替分配(正常组)或空气hbo治疗(对照组)。
Patients were allocated alternately to receive HBO therapy (HBO group) or normal air (control group).
方法治疗组37例，对照组22例，测定治疗前后的宫高、腹围、胎儿双顶径，以及出生后的新生儿体重及胎盘重量。
Method: 37 cases of FGR were enrolled in treatment group and 22 cases of FGR were put into control group.
方法：选择合格冠心病心绞痛患者80例，运用简单随机方法，随机分为治疗组、对照组。
Methods: 80 valid patients were divided into the application therapy group and the control group by the simple randomization.
方法80例急性进展性脑梗死患者随机分为治疗组和对照组，每组40例。
Methods80 patients with progressive cerebral infraction were divided into experiment group and control group with 40 patients in each group.
结果：平喘合剂治疗组与对照组综合疗效无显著差异，治疗组治疗后lpo比治疗前明显降低，SOD治疗后比治疗前显著提高。
Result: There was not obvious difference between Pingchuan Heji group and control group in the clinical curative effect, and Pingchuan Heji could enhance the level of SOD, lower the level of LPO.
结果治疗组皮损愈合程度优于对照组，临床疗效较好，治疗期间未出现严重副反应。
Result the clinical effect of the controlled was better than the blank, and no serious side effect during the treated period.
日常生活能力量表的得分也显示介入治疗组优于对照组，但没有统计学意义。
The Activities of Daily Living score was also better in the intervention group than in controls, although the difference fell short of statistical significance.
方法按完全随机非平衡设计分为治疗组和对照组，治疗组30例，对照组28例。
Methods The cases are divided into treatment group and control group according to completely randomized design of non-equilibrium, treatment group with 30 cases, control group with 28 cases.
方法220例痉挛型脑瘫患儿随机分为治疗组和对照组，各110例。
Methods220 children with spastic type CP were randomly divided into the treatment group and control group with 110 cases in each group.
结论：两组经统计学处理说明治疗组优于对照组。
Conclusion: the curative effect of therapeutic group is better than that of control group.
结论：两组经统计学处理说明治疗组优于对照组。
Conclusion: the curative effect of therapeutic group is better than that of control group.
应用推荐