在对世界各地进行生活满意度的调查中，需要指导受访者在量表中给自己的生活满意度打分，分值从0（生活满意度最差）到10（生活满意度最佳）。
For global life satisfaction, respondents indicated how they would rate their lives on a scale from zero (worst possible life) to 10 (best possible life).
再对符合研究对象的调查，应用一系列统计方法对量表的可行性、信度、效度和反应度进行考评。
Again in line with survey research, applied a series of statistical methods to scale the feasibility, reliability, validity and responsiveness evaluation.
方法采用生活满意度指数A问卷(LSIA)、应付方式问卷、社会支持评定量表对224名农村中小学生教师进行调查。
Methods Surveys on life satisfaction, coping styles and social support were conducted in 224 teachers by applying LSIA questionnaire, coping styles test and social support questionnaire.
方法：对658名初中生进行调查，采用探索性和验证性因素分析等方法探求该量表的信度和效度。
Methods:658 students were investigated with explorative and confirmatory factor analysis to search for the reliability and validity of the Test.
方法以问卷访谈的形式调查892名麻风治愈者，用分半信度、内部一致性、构想效度和结构效度等指标对SF-36量表进行评判。
Methods 892 patients affected by leprosy were assessed with SF-36. Split-half reliability, internal consistency, discriminant validity and construct validity of the scales were tested.
经整理并检验量表品质后发现，调查所得数据符合一般的构思效度和信度要求。
The data has been tested in accordance with the general rule of construct validity and reliability.
两组干预前后分别采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)、特质应对方式(TCSQ)、及自编患者对护理工作满意度调查表进行评价。
All the patients were investigated with Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Traits Coping Styles Questionnaire (TCSQ) and satisfaction with nursing work in patients before and after the intervention.
基于该量表的问卷调查结果显示，量表具有良好的测量信度与效度。
The evaluation scale has adequate reliability and validity, according to test to questionnaire interview data.
在预调查后借助SPSS对初测量表进行项目分析、因子分析及有效性检验，证明参与型体育消费者忠诚度量表信、效度都符合统计学要求。
And then make item analysis, factor analysis, and validity test with SPSS after survey. The result shows that the scale is valid.
在预调查后借助SPSS对初测量表进行项目分析、因子分析及有效性检验，证明参与型体育消费者忠诚度量表信、效度都符合统计学要求。
And then make item analysis, factor analysis, and validity test with SPSS after survey. The result shows that the scale is valid.
应用推荐