实证法学者肯定会得出不存在法律的结论。
现代新自然法学派与实证法学派之争又将这一问题再次突显。
The conflict between modern new natural law school and positive law school has highlighted it again.
后现代法学是继自然法学、分析实证法学、社会学法学三大流派之后的又一具有重大影响的法学思潮。
Post-modern jurisprudence is the legal trend of important influence after natural jurisprudence, positivist jurisprudence, sociological jurisprudence.
在法学史上，自然法学派和分析实证法学派的划分，主要在于他们在法律和道德关系问题上观点的对立。
In jurisprudence history, the classification of the natural law school and the analytic positive law school is mainly based on their antagonistic views upon the relations between law and morality.
但是我们会提出怀疑，实证法学者们是为排除国际法而非为了对法律下一个普遍的定义而重新界定概念。
We may, however, suspect that the positivist is reshaping definitions in order to exclude the international-law case, rather than to arrive at a general definition of law.
但是我们会提出怀疑，实证法学者们是为排除国际法而非为了对法律下一个普遍的定义而重新界定概念。
We may, however, suspect that the positivist is reshaping definitions in order to exclude the international-law case, rather than to arrive at a general definition of law.
应用推荐