目的：观察体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾感染石的疗效。
Objective: to observe the effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal infection stones.
目的探讨影响体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)疗效的因素。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the factors which influence the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).
结论冲击波碎石术对输尿管中下段结石的治疗费用更为经济。
Conclusion it is more economical with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi.
提高体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗较大肾结石的疗效。
To improve the curative effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) on larger renal stones.
目的评价体外冲击波碎石术治疗小儿鹿角状结石的安全性和疗效。
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for staghorn calculi in children.
初次治疗用冲击波碎石术的患者有80.3%（57条输尿管）。
The initial treatment method was shock wave lithotripsy and 80.3% (57 ureters).
目的总结体外冲击波碎石术治疗急诊输尿管结石的经验，评价其应用价值。
Objective To evaluate the clinical application of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL) in the treatment of acute ureteral lithiasis.
目的：研究体外冲击波碎石术（ESWL）配合中药治疗尿路结石的疗效。
Objective:To investigate the effect of ESWL on urinary stone, supported by traditional Chinese medicine.
他们得出结论，依赖于结石负荷，冲击波碎石术是大部分儿童输尿管结石初次治疗时的一种好选择。
They concluded that depending on stone burden, shock wave lithotripsy might be a good option for initial treatment of most ureteral calculi in children.
目的比较输尿管镜钬激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗输尿管结石的有效性和安全性。
Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for ureteral calculi.
为了研究体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)对幼龄肾脏发育及功能的影响，我们设计了幼龄家兔孤肾模型。
In order to study the effects of ESWL on the immature kidney growth and function, we designed the model of immature solitary kidney.
前言： 目的：探讨气压弹道碎石联合体外冲击波碎石术（ ES WL）治疗输尿管结石的临床疗效。
Objective:To study the efficacy of ureteral calculus treated with ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy combined with ESWL.
本文就低能量体外冲击波碎石术提高成功率、减轻结石周围组织损伤及预防结石复发的研究进展做一综述。
This study is to review the progress in the research of elevation of success rate, reduction of tissue injury and prevention of relapse rate of stones.
结论：实验支持体外冲击波碎石术在临床应用，但应尽量避免对肝胆组织的过度冲击，以免产生严重的细胞损伤。
CONCLUSIONS The findings support: the clinical application of ESWL can not make severe damage to the patients, but excessive shock wave firing should be avoided to prevent the inreversible damages.
研究小组发现在经过冲击波碎石术，输尿管镜检查术和开放性手术后，所有的结石排空率分别为75.4， 93.3， 和100%。
The group found that there overall stone free rates after shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and open surgery were 75.4, 93.3, and 100% respectively.
当评价输尿管镜检查术时，纳入了6名冲击波碎石术失败患者(7条输尿管)，总共有14名患者对输尿管下部结石进行输尿管镜检查术治疗。
When they evaluated ureteroscopy they included 6 patients (7 ureters) that failed shock wave lithotripsy and had a total of 14 patients overall who underwent ureteroscopy for lower ureteral calculi.
方法采用微创经皮肾输尿管镜碎石取石术治疗肾输尿管结石83例(A组)，并与采用体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾输尿管结石188例(B组)进行比较。
Method: to treat 83 cases of kidney and ureter calculus by Minimally invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (Group a), and compared with 188 cases of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (Group b).
目的：比较输尿管镜术(URSL)与体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)治疗输尿管远端结石的临床疗效。
Objective To compare the efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for distal ureteral calculi.
结论输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术治疗复杂性输尿管结石安全、有效，尤其适用于体外冲击波碎石效果不佳的患者。
Conclusion Treatment of urinary calculi with this method has been safe, effective and less invasive, especially those failure of ESWL.
结论输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术治疗复杂性输尿管结石安全、有效，尤其适用于体外冲击波碎石效果不佳的患者。
Conclusion Treatment of urinary calculi with this method has been safe, effective and less invasive, especially those failure of ESWL.
应用推荐