这是黑格尔《逻辑学》中的基本概念,主要阐述如下: 纯有是直接的、并且对内对外都不存在差异,因而对有的直观便是一种空的直观。并从中引出纯无,指出有与无是同一的。 黑格尔的纯有是巴门尼得学说的发展,巴门尼得说过:“唯有有而无则全没有”黑格尔进一步指出它们之间有变,因而是同一的。
但是这种纯有是纯粹的抽象,因此也是绝对的否定。这种否定,直接地说来,就是无。
But this mere Being, as it is mere abstraction, is therefore the absolutely negative: which, in a similarly immediate aspect, is just Nothing.
但所有这些给“有”进一步具体的规定,均足以使“有”失却其为刚才所说的那种直接性的纯有。
But every additional and more concrete characterization causes Being to lose that integrity and simplicity it had in the beginning.
“有纯巧克力吗?” — “没有,恐怕对这种巧克力的需求不多。”
"Have you got just plain chocolate?"—"No, I'm afraid there's not much call for that."
This is the homonuclear bond energy for hydrogen in pure hydrogen. There we have perfect covalency.
这是氢的同原子的共价能,在纯氢中,我们有完美的共价键。
Well, yes, with opera of course, but the other eighty percent is purely instrumental music.
没错,歌剧中是有歌词的,但其他百分之八十的古典乐都是纯器乐
And scholarship of the nineteenth century and most of the twentieth century is generally characterized by a deep-seated bias that views impurity rules as primitive and irrational taboos, and sacrifice as controlled savagery that's empty of any spiritual meaning.
十九世纪和二十世纪的大部分时期,学术界都有一个,很深层的偏见,那就是认为不纯的规则是,原始且无理的,献祭是野蛮人才干得出来的,无任何精神意义的活动。
应用推荐