盖茨说:“即使是像分辨开着的门和窗户这样简单的事情,对机器人来说也是很棘手的。”
'Even something as simple as telling the difference between an open door and a window can be tricky for a robot,' says Gates.
盖茨说:“我可以预见,在未来,机器人设备将成为我们日常生活中几乎无处不在的一部分。”
"I can envision a future in which robotic devices will become a nearly ubiquitous part of our day-to-day lives," says Gates.
盖茨说:“事实上,在真正的机器人赶上科幻小说中的机器人之前,我们还有很长的路要走。”
'The fact is we still have a way to go before real robots catch up with their science fiction counterparts,' Gates says.
Milton Friedman makes this argument- All right, so Bill Gates can give to charity if he wants to.
弥尔顿·弗里德曼提出-,你是说,如果盖茨愿意,可以给慈善机构捐款。
Third, some people have said don't the successful like Gates owe a debt to society for their success that they repay by paying taxes.
第三,有人说过,像盖茨这样的成功人士,难道不欠社会,不该通过缴税回报社会吗。
What does count as a violation is an arbitrary taking because that would essentially say, not only to Bill Gates, but to everyone, there is no rule of law.
只有肆意掠夺才算侵犯自然权利,因为从本质上说,那不仅侵犯了比尔·盖茨,还侵犯了其他人,那样就毫无法治可言。
应用推荐