最近发表在英国皇家学会开放科学网站上的一篇题为《烂科学的自然选择》的论文,试图回答这个有趣而重要的问题。
A recent paper, titled "The Natural Selection of Bad Science", published on the Royal Society's open science website, attempts to answer this intriguing and important question.
至少这是世界最古老的科学学会——英国皇家学会发布的一份报告得出的结论。
That, at least, is the conclusion of a report published by Britain's Royal Society, the world‘s oldest scientific academy.
时钟宇宙:艾萨克·牛顿,英国皇家学会,现代世界的诞生。
The Clockwork Universe: Isaac Newton, the Royal Society, and the Birth of the Modern World.
When he presented his results at the sitting of the Royal Society, he was ridiculed.
当他将他的结果展示于,英国皇家学会,他被人愚弄着。
There was no equivalent of the Royal Society that you're reading about in London that was very important in the diffusion of the scientific revolution.
在俄国没有与英国皇家学会一样的组织,伦敦的皇家学会对科学革命的传播非常重要
All right, July, 1913, blow this up, so On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules by N. Bohr, Doctor of Philosophy, Copenhagen, asterisk here, and I've blown up the bottom of the page, communicated by Professor Ernest Rutherford, F.R.S., Fellow of the Royal Society.
913年,六月,发表了,波尔博士,建立了原子分子模型,哥本哈根,星号这儿,我通过和恩内斯特卢瑟福的交流,被这页底部的所震惊了,英国皇家学会会员。
应用推荐