对霍布斯和特拉西·马库斯而言，根本不存在能高过君主意愿，和言辞的上诉法院，更没有什么卓绝或是神圣的法律，以及其他权力是可以高于君主的命令的。

There is for Hobbes, as for Thrasymachus, no higher court of appeal than the will or the word of the sovereign, no transcendent law, no divine law, no source of authority outside sovereign command.

youdao

这又把我们带回到，第一本书《理想国》中，特拉西·马库斯的观点上。

And, again, that seems to point back to Thrasymachus' point of view in the first book of the Republic.

youdao