如果觉得我有偏见,先道个歉,可对我来说,西方人很善于把科学和艺术分开,创建外在的概念结构,并把它们应用在真实世界中,去解决重复出现的问题。
Sorry if I'm biased, but to me, Western people are very good at separating science and art, creating explicit concept structures and applying them to the real world so to attack repetitious problems.
现在让我再重复一下我刚刚的问题--你最后一次发自内心的笑容是什么时候?
So let me repeat my original question – when was the last time you truly laughed?
我重复一下我写的关于风格的内容:尽管大量发布的内存问题描述都强调工具和语言,对于我来说,最大的收获来自“软的”以开发人员为中心的流程变更。
I repeat what I wrote about style: While most published descriptions of memory problems emphasize tools and languages, for me, the greatest gains come from "soft," developer-centered process changes.
And if I remember at least, I will repeat the question out loud so that everybody can hear it.
至少我肯定会记得,把问题大声的重复一遍,那么所有人都可以听到了。
OK. So, what do I want you to take away from this? This idea of binary search is going to be a really powerful tool. And it has this property again, of chopping things into pieces.
从这里学到些什么?二分查找的思想,是一个非常有用的工具,我重复一遍,把问题拆成几部分来解决,那事实上,这里的增长率是多少?
Because we are on tape I'll repeat any questions that come in.
因为我们的课在录音,所以我要把问题重复一遍。
应用推荐