...论的背景，是要回应各种解构中国的挑战，有西方学者强调现代民族国家不过是十八九世纪的「想像共同体（imagined communities），亦有人批判中国国族主义者以国族作为上下连贯的主体书写历史，遏抑各种社群想像论述，统摄各种异质力量。
基于84个网页-相关网页
即使在一些被认可的“居民”之间，想像共同体的方式也总是因人而异。
Even among the more or less accredited "inhabitants," there will always be idiosyncratic variations in the way they conceive of the universe.
最后，民族被想像为一个共同体，因为尽管在每个民族内部可能存在普遍的不平等与剥削，民族总是被设想为一种深刻的，平等的同志爱。
Finally, it is imagined as a community, because, regardless of the actual inequality and exploitation that may prevail in each, the nation is always conceived as a deep, horizontal comradeship.
其实，一个共同体，只要比面对面接触的原始村落更大(或许甚至连这样的村落)，都是想像的。
In fact, all communities larger than primordial villages of face-to-face contact (and perhaps even these) are imagined.
应用推荐