如哈格尔指出的,布林约尔松和麦卡菲确实在他们的书中提到了这一点。
As Hagel notes, Brynjolfsson and McAfee indeed touched on this point in their book.
在这一点上,让我们把灯光调暗,这样我们就能看到这些幻灯片,实实在在地看看他们使用的技术。
On that note, let's dim the lights, so we can see these slides and actually look at the techniques they used.
这一点实在需要被考虑在内,甚至在理解话语有什么作用时候,更别说在理解话语什么时候不起作用时了。
That really needs to be taken into account even in understanding what speech can do let alone in understanding what speech can't do.
Now, these comments, frankly, are brain-damaged, or computationally challenged if you prefer.
现在,这些注释,实在点说,没什么用,或者说是对计算有挑战的,如果你喜欢这么说的话。
应用推荐