这一案例的根本争议是在安全与自由之间进行的。
The argument in the case was basically between safety and freedom.
如果没有这些权利所带来的安全与自由,保持高水准的精神健康状态会十分困难。
Without the security and freedom provided by these rights, it is very difficult to maintain a high level of mental health.
我们倾向于,将分权原理想成是,个人安全与自由的必备条件,不是吗?
We tend to think of the separation of powers doctrine as necessary for the security and liberty of the individual? Don't we?
We tend to think of the separation of powers doctrine as necessary for the security and liberty of the individual ? don't we?
我们倾向于,将分权原理想成是,个人安全与自由的必备条件,不是吗?
We usually think of individual freedom and security as the purpose of the separation of power.
我们通常认为,个人自由与安全,是分权的目的。
应用推荐