我不明白支持他论据的是什么逻辑。
这是什么逻辑?
然而,具体是什么逻辑错误这个问题却在哲学家和逻辑学家之间引起了争论。
However, exactly what logical error is being committed by attempting to do so has remained a cause of much dispute amongst philosophers and logicians.
It's a matter of inference, not just to any old explanation, but inference to the best explanation.
这是逻辑推论的结果,不是随便什么陈旧的解释,而是最佳解释的推论结果
What else is the flaw? Where's the flaw in this logic?
还有什么不对的地方,逻辑上还有什么错误?
Isn't there a kind of logical requirement that for something to be bad for you ? you've got to be around to receive that bad thing?
难道没有这样一种逻辑要求吗,如果有什么事物对你来说有坏处,你不是应该去接受那个有害的事物吗?
应用推荐