这是什么逻辑啊——尤其是哈克和德瑞福尔斯刚刚还在为支持哲学和批判性思考而争辩？
Where's the logic here-especially since Hacker and Dreifus have just been arguing in favor of philosophy and critical thinking?
我感兴趣的是，也是我觉得很多读者应该感兴趣的是，当他们阅读《论出版自由》时，到底是什么允许了，为什么这本著作这么容易就被理解为在批判控制。
What I am interested in here, and I think what a lot of readers are interested in when they approach Areopagitica, is why this treatise, why it can so easily be read as an argument against censorship.
什么是你想要改变的想法呢？也许是那些自我批判、忧虑、恐惧或其它。把它们写下来。
What are some of the thoughts you would like to transform? Perhaps these are thoughts of self-criticism, worry, fear, or others. Note them here.
应用推荐