GM, which plans to begin promoting its relisting on the stock exchange to investors this week, wiped out billions of dollars in debt, laid off thousands of employees and jettisoned money-losing brands during its U.S.-funded reorganization last year.
If after this much time, by this many experienced attorneys, spending this much money, and conducting these many interviews, the evidence he sent does not support the charges he makes, how does renaming or relisting or further subdividing the grounds using that same evidence as majority counsel has just done make the case any stronger or the issues any clearer?