They argue that gross inequality tears at the human psyche, creating anxiety, distrust and an array of mental and physical ailments - and they cite mountains of data to support their argument.
他们称显著的不平等扭曲了人们的心理,制造了焦虑、怀疑以及一系列精神和身体上的疾病——他们引用了大量的数据来证明他们的论证。
Without the physical token, the argument goes, authentication should not be possible.
如果没有物理标记,勿庸质疑,就不可能进行认证。
Perhaps the argument shouldn't be, "We have to believe in souls because no mere physical object could reason."
也许论证不应该是,我们必须相信灵魂,因为所有的物理对象都不能推理。
Perhaps the argument should be, "We have to believe in souls because no mere physical object, no machine could feel."
而应该是,我们不得不相信灵魂,因为所有物理对象,所有的机器都没有感觉
Perhaps the argument shouldn't be, "We have to believe in souls because no mere physical object could reason."
也许论证不应该是,我们必须相信灵魂,因为所有的物理对象都不能推理
Now, if we push the dualist to explain what is it about free will that rules out the possibility that we are merely physical objects, I think the natural suggestion to spell out the argument goes like this, and this is where we were at the end of last time.
现在如果我们让二元论者去解释,什么是自由意志,它又是如何否定,人仅仅是物理实体这种可能性的,我认为他们自然会这样,阐述这个论证,这是就我们在上节课结束时讲到的内容
应用推荐