比如说，我们在读《芬尼根的守灵》时，我们完全无法领会。

For example, we're reading Finnegan's Wake. We haven't got a clue.

youdao

在创作的早期，乔伊斯遵循的是中立、冷漠的现代叙述原则，但到了《芬尼根的守灵》，乔伊斯使叙述成了叙述者的快乐言说。

Joyce obeyed the modern narrative principle of neutrality and detachment during his early period of writing. However in Finnegans Wake, Joyce created a loquacious narrator.

youdao

詹姆斯·乔伊斯(2)写的《尤利西斯》和《芬尼根守灵记》，如同互相撞击，前后参映的思想网络，每次阅读都会有变幻不定的感觉。

James Joyce wrote Ulysses and Finnegan's Wake as a network of ideas colliding, cross-referencing, and shifting upon each reading.

youdao

For example, we're reading Finnegan's Wake. We haven't got a clue.

比如说，我们在读《芬尼根的守灵》时，我们完全无法领会。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

In other words, you might think of it as a kind of artificial, processed, bland, easily consumable version of fate. I really mean that. One of the funny things about that debt to Finnegans Wake is, Finnegans Wake as a book of puns is unreadable.

也就是说，你可能会把它当做一种人为的，处理过的，乏味的，容易消耗的命运，我正是此意,关于《芬尼根守灵夜》中一个有趣的事是,它作为一本充满双关语的书是不值得一读的。

耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选