... 具有科技攻坚能力 be capable of tackling key research topics 是没有科学依据的 without scientific reason or proof 有科学史家迪尔 peter dear ...
基于2个网页-相关网页
这些公司宣称BPA是安全的，向FDA(美国食品和药物管理局)申请的决定是没有科学依据的。
The companies maintain that BPA is safe and the decision to petition the FDA was not influenced by science.
但是他们从来没有引用任何所谈到的科学依据，当你想看看他们的研究方法时，就会发现这只不过是一种虚夸的言辞。
But they never cite any of the science they're talking about and when you look at the way they apply it, it's just rhetoric.
凯比告诉法新社：“300只灰狼是一个随意的决定，没有任何科学依据，是凭空造出来的。
It was an arbitrary number. It was not based on any science.
应用推荐