简而言之，对两位科学哲学家，战略管理都不能被视为一种真正的科学范式或研究纲领。
In short, to both philosophers of science, strategic management should not be seen as a genuinely scientific paradigm or research programme.
在库恩主义的科学模型中，战略管理的科学地位可被认为是一种前范式，在这一阶段。
In a Kuhnian model of science, the scientific status of strategic management should be considered as pre-paradigm, the period during which.
用库恩主义的术语说就是，战略管理学科是一种前范式还是后范式；或者用拉卡托斯主义的术语，战略管理学科是一门不成熟科学还是成熟科学？
To uses the Kuhnian terminology, is it a pre-paradigm or post-paradigm or, to use the Lakatosian’s, is it an immature or mature science?
应用推荐