So we consider a text as a structured entity, or perhaps as an entity which is structured and yet at the same time that's the case with Roland Barthes.
所以,我们把原文视为一个结构上的实体,或者是作为一个,有结构上的实体同时,这就是罗兰,巴特的例子。
In other words, the author, the traditional idea of the author -so much under suspicion in the work of Foucault and Barthes in the late sixties — can be turned on its ear.
换言之,有一种传统的看法就是对作者置之不理,六十年代晚期在福柯和巴特的,作品中有那么多疑点。
It's not just a question, as obviously Foucault and Barthes are always suggesting, of deferring to authority as though the authority were the police with a baton in its hand, right?
这不仅仅是一个,如福柯和巴特经常暗示的一样明显的,尊崇作者权威就好像这种权威,是一个手握警棍的警官的问题,对吧?
It's not just a question, as obviously Foucault and Barthes are always suggesting, of deferring to authority as though the authority were the police with a baton in its hand, right?
这不仅仅是一个,如福柯和巴特经常暗示的一样明显的,尊崇作者权威就好像这种权威,是一个手握警棍的警官的问题,对吧?
So we consider a text as a structured entity, or perhaps as an entity which is structured and yet at the same time that's the case with Roland Barthes.
所以,我们把原文视为一个结构上的实体,或者是作为一个,有结构上的实体同时,这就是罗兰,巴特的例子。
In other words, the author, the traditional idea of the author -so much under suspicion in the work of Foucault and Barthes in the late sixties--can be turned on its ear.
换言之,有一种传统的看法就是对作者置之不理,六十年代晚期在福柯和巴特的,作品中有那么多疑点。
应用推荐