换言之，考茨基是个叛徒。
考茨基与俄国和布尔什·维克有着一层特殊的关系。
1920年夏天以后，不管正面还是负面，都很少提到考茨基。
After the summer of 1920, there are very few references to Kautsky, either positive or negative.
这些评论切中要点，因为拙作中并未提到列宁与考茨基的后期关系。
These critics are justified in challenging me on this point, since I said nothing in my book about Lenin's later relation to Kautsky.
所以列宁对“考 茨基主义”的谴责并不代表他对考茨基战前思想的态度。
Thus Lenin’s condemnation of “Kautskyism” does not tell us anything about his attitude toward Kautsky’s prewar thought.
在1915年的一篇文章中，考茨基引用了自己在1904年的早期文章。
In an article written in 1915, Kautsky had referred to his own earlier article from 1904.
数据库给我们的答案是清晰明了的：列宁认为是考茨基变了，而不是他自己。
The answer given to us by the database is unambiguous: Lenin felt that Kautsky had changed, not himself.
那么随之而来的问题是，列宁在1914年后如何看待自己早期对考茨基的推崇呢？
The question arises, how did Lenin after 1914 regard his own earlier admiration for Kautsky?
我变了，即：我列宁现在意识到之前是我错了，我不该那么推崇考茨基。
B. I have changed, that is: I, Lenin, now realize that I was wrong, that my earlier admiration was a mistake.
以上两种关于列宁在1914年后对考茨基的态度变化的假说哪种有事实依据支撑？
These are the two possibilities. Which description of Lenin’s post-1914 attitude is supported by the evidence?
认为列宁与考茨基之间存在鸿沟的批评者认为列宁的主张早在1902年就开始与“考茨基主义”背道而驰了。
Critics who see a gulf between Kautsky and Lenin claim that Lenin's outlook had already started to diverge fundamentally from "Kautskyism" by 1902.
认为列宁与考茨基之间存在鸿沟的批评者认为列宁的主张早在1902年就开始与“考茨基主义”背道而驰了。
Critics who see a gulf between Kautsky and Lenin claim that Lenin's outlook had already started to diverge fundamentally from "Kautskyism" by 1902.
应用推荐