And just as a fun aside, we also realized as computer scientists that sometimes technology is not the answer.

抛开趣味性不提，我们意识到作一个,计算机科学家来说技术,并不是我们要的最终答案。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Okay, so why was it after all that work -- why was it that 1 wasn't the winning answer?

为什么经过一系列的推理,1不是最终的答案呢

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

If you have this so-called base case, can we actually get to a definitive answer eventually?

如果有了这个所谓的基本条件，那我们最终,能得到一个明确的答案吗？

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

The question that we're ultimately hoping to get an answer to: Could I survive my death?

我们最终要,得出答案的问题是：,我可否免于死亡？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

But the answer to your question in the end is, " "no."

但最终，你这个问题的答案是，“不相信“

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

Remember last time, we wrote this simple piece of code to print out even or odd. If, you know, x, 1 it was in fact, even or odd. So let me show you what a flow chart for that would look like, because I want to make a comparison point here.

这就像这里有一些脚蹼一样,首先进行测试，然后把球这样放来让ANS加,然后回来继续测试，最终跳出循环然后打印答案。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

would have been the winning answer had everyone assumed that the average would have been constantly compounded down to 1, but since a couple of people chose the, I mean not incorrect answers, but the higher averages, then it was pushed up to 13.

如果大家都认为,平均数会一直下降到1的话,1应该是最终的答案,但是由于一部分人选择了,并不是说是错误的,但是却高于平均值的数,就把平均数推高到了13

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选