- >> I'll keep asking until we get the right -- until we all merge on the same one.
>,我将一直问,直到我们得到了正确的答案-,直到我们都得到同一个答案。
And, that's a good thing to know because if you come out with an answer that's somewhere near the diameter of the universe and it's supposed to be the diameter of an atom, then you will know that you probably made a mistake.
这是我们需要知道的,因为当你做一道题得到的答案,是宇宙的直径,而正确答案是原子直径时,你能很快发现你的错误。
So, let's consider some people got it wrong, however, and let's see where that wrong answer might have come from, or actually, more importantly, let's see how we can all get to the correct answer.
我们来考虑一下为什么有些人做错了,然而我们来看看,这个错误的答案从何而来,或者事实上更重要的,我们来看看怎样才能都得到正确答案。
And presumably if we do this again and again, we'd get back some similarly correct answers.
可以推测,如果我们反复地做这个,我们会得到类似的正确的答案。
We have the same basic structure, the same outcomes, but we imagine people cared about different things and we end up with a very different answer.
博弈的结构,结果都一样,但是人们在乎的东西不同了,所以我们得到了完全不同的答案
That seems,more or less, the right answer from the physicalist point of view, although as we'll see probably later today, we need to refine it somewhat.
这或多或少,是从物理主义者角度得到的正确答案,纵然我们后面还会看到,这个答案是需要完善的。
one of the answers we should receive would be: " "It is happiness."
我们应该得到的一个答案是:,“是快乐“
And when I ran that it, I got weird results, 300 because we know that a Google priced at, say, 300, is much more likely to move by 10 points in a day than a stock that's priced at $0.50.
当运行这个程序的时我得到很奇怪的答案,因为我们知道一只谷歌的股价大概是,对一个0。5美元的股票来讲,每天改变10个点才比较正常。
What the clicker is is a little device that will allow you to enter responses to questions that will then get entered into my computer and we can show immediate poll results from the class.
表决器是一种小型设备,你可以通过它回答问题,这些答案会传进我的电脑,我们就可以迅速地得到投票结果
The seconds cross out, the kilograms cross out, one of the meters crosses out from the top, so we're left with an answer in meters.
秒消掉了,千克消掉了,单位米和上面的一起约去了,所以我们得到的答案只剩下米。
If you have this so-called base case, can we actually get to a definitive answer eventually?
如果有了这个所谓的基本条件,那我们最终,能得到一个明确的答案吗?
Compare after 30 or 60 seconds with the person next to you and see if before I reveal the answer we can't get everyone on to the exact same page.
和你身边的人比较30到60秒钟,看看是否在我揭露答案之前,我们不能使每个人,得到一个完全相同的页面。
At this point, we get a different kind of answer.
这时我们得到不同的答案。
And that idea was, we make a guess in the middle, we test it so this is kind of a guess and check, and if the answer was too big, then we knew that we should be looking over here. If it was too small, we knew we should be looking over here, and then we would repeat.
这些有理数是有序排列的,然后我们的想法是,首先在中间取个数作为猜想数,然后对这个猜想数进行验证,如果由猜想数得到的答案太大,我们知道应该跳过,比猜想数大的那个区间,如果太小的话。
All right, we're-- well actually, I should say that better, we first check to see, is x 0 greater than or equal to zero, if it's not, then we come down here and we print something out, otherwise we run through a little loop to get the answer, and then we check it and we spit something out.
然后我们运行一个小循环,好了,我们现在来看看,如果x≥0或者x<,我们看这儿,我们会输出一些内容,或者我们运行一个小循环来获取答案,然后我们检验一下,然后得到结果。
It could be the pair of none, none, it could be the pair of, you know, whatever the answer was that we put up there. That value comes back out and is now available inside the scope of Barnyard. OK. And Barnyard then uses that. Question?
也可以是,你知道,任何我们在这里得到的答案,这个返回的值在Barnyard范围内,就可以使用了,然后Barnyard就使用了这个值,有什么问题吗?
应用推荐