The other theme that we see throughout the Deuteronomistic material is the negative presentation of the Canaanites.
我们在《申命记》中看到的另一主题是,对迦南人负面的描述。
The revolt model proposes that Israel began really as a social revolution within Canaan.
反抗模型中说,以色列一开始是由迦南内部的社会革命而起。
At some point there was a desire to separate, and in that process of identity formation, a polemic began to develop that created Yahweh in a distinct way, differentiated from the Canaanite deities.
某些时候,有非常强烈的分离的愿望,在这个过程中,也就形成了他们自己的身份,塑造截然不同的耶和华这一理论便开始发展,要与迦南的众神有所差别。
If the Israelites were, in fact, basically Canaanites, who had withdrawn from the larger collective, who insisted on the overlordship of Yahweh, then Canaanites who did not join them in this were a special threat to the new Yahwism.
如果以色列人实际上是迦南人,他们从大团体中撤离,他们坚持耶和华的霸主般的唯一地位,那么没有加入他们的迦南人,对于新的耶和华崇拜便是一种威胁。
And why the claim of the utter destruction of the Canaanites when evidence points to close Canaanite origins? This practice, which I mentioned before and is known as herem or the ban, is not unique to Israel. I know some of you have studied it in sections you looked at the inscription of King Mesha, King Mesha of Moab.
那为何要声称迦南彻底的毁灭呢?,当证据指出了迦南的起源,这一习俗,也就是我之前提到的禁忌或祭祀,并不是以色列独有的,我想你们也已经学过,你们看摩押米沙王的题词,摩押的米沙王。
The ritual cult of the Israelites may look like that of their neighbors but it functioned very differently; its purpose was drastically different from that of Israel's neighbors. The Israelites like their neighbors may have set up a king over themselves. But Israelite monarchy differed from Canaanite monarchy in significant ways because of their monotheism.
从祭拜仪式上看,以色列人和邻国类似,但操作起来很不一样,而目的则完全相反,以色列人可能会像邻国那样,拥立一位君主,然而受一神论的影响,以色列的君主政体和迦南地区的有明显差异。
El According to Canaanite mythology, Baal defeated El, and assumed his position at a certain point as the head of the Canaanite pantheon, so there was a switch in Canaanite mythology, from El to Baal becoming supreme.
根据迦南神话,Baal打败了,在某一时期担任了职务,作为迦南万神庙的首领,因此迦南神话中有一个转折,从El至高无上的地位到Baal的无上地位。
应用推荐