• So he says that position 1, strategy 1, choosing the most extreme left wing position is a dominated strategy.

    说到立场1,也就是策略1,即选择最极端的左翼立场,是劣势策略

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So not only was he choosing a position close to the Conservatives: he was choosing exactly their position.

    不只是选了一个临近保守派的立场,选的就是一个保守派的立场

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • From the standpoint of a devout person, he had no doubt that poetry was inferior to divinity.

    站在神职人员的立场来看,毫无疑问会将诗学排在神学之后。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • The Second Brother, you'll remember, had taken what I take to be the perfectly reasonable position, the cautious position, that the Lady is in danger - that she's a sitting duck, in fact, out there in the dangerous forest.

    戏中的弟弟,你们记得,采取了,我认为非常合理的立场,小心谨慎的立场认为那位少女处于危险的境地,-她只身于危险的丛林之中,极易受到伤害。

    耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

  • In either case, they regard him as surreptitiously taking the side of the people against the nobles.

    二者都把看作是秘密地,站在人民的立场上反抗权贵的人。

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • So he offers a series of arguments for that conclusion, for that position, and starting next time, we'll work our way through those arguments.

    因而给出一系列论证,来证明这个结论,证明这个立场,下节课开始,我们将讨论这些论证

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • .. And I begin by remembering... this is the way I begin most of my economic thoughts ...a conversation I had with Milton Friedman And Milton started with the position, first of all, what he wanted to do was decrease government spending.

    我记得。,我习惯这么思考经济问题了,我记得曾和米尔顿·弗里德曼谈过一次话,刚开始,米尔顿的立场是,有一点先说明,其实是希望,政府削减财政支出的。

    斯坦福公开课 - 经济学课程节选

  • First of all, I found secretary Rumsfeld a very easy person to deal with in a sense that he's very professional, very strict, very honest, not the kind of guy who, you know, take a different position, try to around behind your back. If he's going to stab you, he's going to stab you in the chest.

    首先,我发现拉姆斯菲尔德秘书长,是很容易打交道的人,我指的是非常专业,非常严格,非常诚恳,不像那类人,因为观点立场不同,就从你背后放冷箭,如果想杀了你,也是从正面进攻。

    普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选

  • A candidate could say during an election that "I'm a moderate candidate, I'm at position 5" but you might not believe him or her.

    一个候选人在整个大选中可能说,我是个中立的候选人,我的立场是5,但你不一定就相信/她的说法

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So 2 against 1 gives me 90% of the votes, 3 against 1 gives me what?

    我选立场2选1,我得90%选票,要是我选立场3对手选1呢

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • These are just two incompatible moral positions that Machiavelli states but he goes further than this.

    这是马基雅维利所言的两种不可调和的,对立道德立场,但是并未就此善罢甘休。

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • Though he sometimes does talk about texts that we call "literary," indeed he very often does, nevertheless Derrida's position and the logic of that position suggest that we can't really reliably discriminate among genres.

    尽管有时确实会讨论被我们称为“文学“的文本“,事实上经常如此,然而德里达的立场他立场的逻辑,是我们不能够明确地划分文学的体裁。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • So it could be--From Hannibal's point of view he doesn't know which pass you're going to defend, but let's have a look at his payoffs.

    站在汉尼拔的立场,应该,不知道你会防守哪条路,但让我们看看的收益

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • He tries to defend his point of view by arguing in a famous passage that his policy of abstinence actually carries important benefits to the city.

    在其著名答辩中的立场,试图证明,其疏离策略,其实能为为城邦带来显著好处。

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • It's something that the philosophical position sacrifices.

    这使的哲学立场中牺牲的部分。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • Let's put ourselves in Hannibal's shoes, they're probably boots or something.

    我们应该站在汉尼拔的立场来看问题,管穿的是鞋子还是靴子呢

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • And when somebody else then attacks them, say, "Look, I think that what John was saying was a good point and here's how I think he should have defended his position," or what have you.

    并且当其人攻击们时,你说听着我觉得约翰说的是个好点子,和这是我认为应该怎样维护自己的立场“,或者你有什么。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • And if I chose 2 against 3, what do I get? I get 20, I get all the people at 1 and I get all the people 2, so I get 20%, so we're okay again.

    如果我选立场2立场3,我会得到20%的选票,立场1和立场2的选票都归我,所以是20%,大家都明白了吧

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So if you defend the easy pass, from his point of view, it doesn't matter whether he chooses the easy pass and gets one in there or the hard pass, he gets one in there.

    那么如果你防守平坦的路,从立场出发,无论怎么选择,选崎岖之途收益是1,而选择平坦之途的收益也是1

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So suppose my opponent chooses 2.

    假设选择立场2

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So these are the potential voters and and each of them is in the position that Fred Thompson was in, two weeks ago in the Republican Primary, when he's deciding whether to run or not.

    这些是潜在选民并且,每个人都处于弗雷德·汤普森曾经的立场,就在两周前的共和党初选,当考虑是否参加选举时

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So we have many candidates, So we have many candidates, more than just two; or we have not voting, which is related to that actually; and we have choosing your position, the inability to commit to a position.

    有多位候选人,实际情况下候选人不只有两个,存在弃权票,这也是很正常的,还有就是候选人,未必能够坚守立场

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • But it gets back to the question, are the reasons Socrates gives Crito for refusing to escape, the reasons he puts in the mouth of the laws of the city of Athens, ? are those Socrates' true reasons?

    但这带回到那个问题,到底苏格拉底给克里托,拒绝越狱的理由,以雅典城邦法律立场,所说的理由,是苏格拉底真正的理由吗?

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • So, what you might say is a Socratic citizen to do, he will either be accused of being ironic and not be believed or he will simply be disbelieved if he attempts to defend himself on rational or philosophical grounds.

    你可能会说,一位苏格拉底时代公民被指控的原因,可能是嘲讽和不被相信,或根本就不被信任,如果试图,从理性或达观的立场来捍卫自己。

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定