• "There,and if I haven't gone and tired you all out with my talkin'!"

    VOA: special.2010.05.15

  • - You open Brooks and you find yourself really apart perhaps-- I don't know how well all of you are acquainted with the texts of Freud.

    也许你们看布鲁克斯的作品时会觉得很头疼-,我不知道你们对弗洛伊德那几篇文章理解的如何了。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • but didn't have all the of the qualities of somebody who you should feel comfortable with.

    但你觉得这个人没有所有的素质,让你觉得不自在。

    I should have 课堂 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

  • The point is to defend the rights of people you don't agree with. That's the idea of a democracy, that all opinions are heard,".

    VOA: standard.2009.10.23

  • So what do you have with all these other people, these other Romans around here, who don't have a powerful patron, who don't have a powerful paterfamilias to help them out?

    那这些人怎么办?,其他普通罗马人,没有强大的庇护人,没有强大的家长帮忙?

    耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

  • So, let's -- okay, so, why don't you all think about would happen -- we'll start with the thought exercise. You can switch back to my lecture notes then if this isn't going.

    好吧,那你们想想会,发生什么,我们来想想,这个问题,如果那个不行的话,你可以转到我的讲义上来了。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • If a White House isn't careful, all you end up doing with the schedule isn't in bucks.

    如果不认真处理总统的时间表,最后你就会,付上很大的代价。

    普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选

  • So van Inwagen concludes, if you have an object, and you take it apart, and then put them all back together again, you don't have the very same object that you started out with.

    所以范·,因瓦根总结道,如果你将拥有的物体拆开,再把所有的零件重组,你手上的并非,原来的那个物体。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • We started out with just a simple idea: that you don't want to put all your eggs in one basket and if you had a lot of independent stocks you would want to just weight them equally.

    我们从一个简单的想法开始:,你不想把所有的鸡蛋放入一个篮子里,如果你有许多互相独立的股票,你给它们相同的权重。

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • Now since I think that the arguments I'm about to sketch-- and I've just started sketching the first of is fails I hope you'll think it over and you'll eventually come to agree with me, yeah, these arguments don't really work after all.

    由于我并不认同我将要介绍的论点,尽管我已经开始概述其中的第一个分论点了,我希望你们能够认真思考,最终你们也会同我的观点一致,的确,这些论点都不成立

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • So, having other particles around that have the same energy that you could technically add up if you were adding them up like a wave, you can't do the same thing with particles, they're all separate.

    所以,如果它们是波,你可以把其他的,拥有相同能量的粒子加起来,但是你不能把这些粒子加起来,因为它们是分离的。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • If you try to imagine a smile with no body at all, it can't be done. Why?

    如果你要相信一个没有身体的微笑,那是根本做不到的 为什么呢

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • So what I want to point out with this case in beryllium is that you don't have to use all of the electrons to figure out the bond order, and in fact, once you get to molecules 10 that are from atoms with atomic numbers of 8 or 10, you're not going to want to maybe draw out the full molecular orbital diagram.

    我要指出的是,在Be这种情况下,你不需要利用,所有的电子来指导键序,实际上,一旦分子中,原子序数到达了8或者,你也许不想画出,整个分子轨道图。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定