It also is the case that probably many of you have already read it and possibly studied it in school and talked about it.
也有可能是你们很多人都已经读过,也有可能是在学校的时候就学过并讨论过的。
So it could be dangerous anywhere in New York. It's not as dangerous as it used to be.
所以,纽约的任何地方都可能有危险。现在没从前那么危险了。
Most of the children when they travel there, we would probably go to her apartment But they would probably have a charming mill on the floor.
大多数孩子,去那旅游时,都有可能去她家,她们家的地上可能会有,一台漂亮的磨粉机。
And the interesting thing is, I think you can see-- you can get a feel for both possible answers here.
有趣的是,我想你会发现-,你觉得两种答案都有可能。
In fact to write a run those same experience-- those same experiments now with the even greater volume of data computers are now producing I'd probably have terabytes worth of data and at that point things just would have broken.
事实上-,目前使用大量数据的相同实验中,计算机会产生,兆兆字节的数据,那时,一切都有可能遭到破坏。
So in all probability, anyone who was associated with the hated occupying regime would be treated poorly It all seems to fit.
因此极有可能,任何一个人,与当权政府有关系的人都遭受虐待,一切看来没什么不妥。
And that's not possible in all parts of the world, not everybody has that opportunity to interact with medical professionals that often.
而这不可能在世界各处都能实现,并不是每个人都经常有机会见到医生的
Any one of those things is possible it's just the simple math that I just showed you.
以上这些都是有可能的,都是刚刚讲到的简单计算。
Given the number of people in the room there may be multiple winners, I accept that possibility.
教室里每个人都写个数字,确实有可能出现多个赢家
They all, I mean, they have similarities, in fact maybe more similar than different.
我是说,它们都有相似之处,事实上相似之处可能比不同之处更多。
We probably don't find any forms of the Cassava plant ever in the U.S.
在美国很可能永远都找不到,任何形式的有这么高含量的。
Or it could be uniform, where every value was equally probable.
还有均匀分布,每个值都有相同的可能性。
Is it possible to aggregate all values to translate them into dollar terms?
所有的价值都有可能用金钱衡量吗?
In comes the prehensile thumb, and the next thing you know you get a colossal earthquake, and the possessor of the prehensile thumb disappears from the earth -which is to say, very possibly the human species will never develop.
就像对人类进化至关重要的大拇指,经历了一场大地震后,如果所有有这种拇指的人都消失了,那么人类就很可能永远不能进化。
All matter contains within it something like a "potency of life"; that's Milton's phrase. It has a capacity for action, actually a capacity for motion, and, just as books can take on a life of their own in Areopagitica, so all matter for later Milton.
所有物质都更包含一种类似“生命的潜质“的东西;,这是弥尔顿的原话,所有物质都有行动的可能,运动的可能,正如《论出版自由》中书籍可以有自己的,生命一样,晚年的弥尔顿相信一切物质都是这样。
They might matter a lot because humans have, in general, a confirmation bias such that once you believe something other information is then encoded along the likes to support what you believe.
可能是因为人…,所有人都有确认偏向,也就是说,一旦你相信了某件事,其他信息都会被你解读成,支持你所相信的信息。
You kinda think that anything is possible.
让你觉得一切都有可能。
Although most of you would probably say "well it's--all these things are involved, at least to some extent,"society defaults to certain assumptions about what's driving food intake and there are some people that default to an environmental explanation of this.
尽管你们大部分人可能会说,"和以上这些因素都有关系,至少有些关系",社会共识,某些原因造成了我们摄取过多垃圾食品,一些人把这归咎于环境原因
He met the Attorney General, the Director of the Central Intelligence, the Director of the National Intelligence, eventually the Director of a Fusion Centre where all of the intelligence communities came together to talk about the threats.
总统还会会见司法部长,中央情报局局长,国家情报局局长,最后是一个集合中心的负责人,所有的情报组织都聚在那里,讨论有可能存在的威胁。
And by this time all educated Roman men were expected to be able to speak Greek, well if possible.
那时所有受过教育的罗马男子,有可能的话,都要会说希腊语。
How could it be that death is bad for me ? when I don't exist?
死亡怎么可能对我来说有坏处,当我都不存在了?
A piece of Jell-o has probably 99% water in it, but it has a shape.
一块果冻里可能99%都是水,但它有固定形状
A lot of the examples that we're going to give you in terms of trying out your Lewis structures will be molecule that are used in organic synthesis, or maybe they're molecules that react in interesting ways with biomolecules in your body or proteins in your body.
很多我们将要用来,训练路易斯结构的例子,都是在有机合成中用到的分子,也有可能是那些在你体内的生物分子,或者蛋白质中发生有趣反应的分子。
Every single thing that we discuss here could be pursued at greater depth.
每一件我们在这讨论的,都有可能到一个更深的境界。
So it's these little differences that you'll very quickly acclimate to but it's these stupid little syntactic details that trips off, especially those less comfortable early on because if you leave out a single character, namely that semicolon on the right hand side, nothing will work.
你会很快适应这些,微小的区别,但我们正是要把这些罗里吧嗦的语法细节,尤其是那些让人非常头大的句子啃下来才行,因为如果我们一旦遗漏掉某个符号,譬如一个分号,从另一方面看来,很有可能什么都工作不了。
And again, you can sort of feel the pull both ways.
再次,你觉得两种答案都有可能。
Well, one reason to do this is because on each post-synaptic neuron there might be many axons coming together at once, and each one might be generating a different kind of signal, through maybe even different neurotransmitters.
嗯 一个原因是在每个,突触后神经元上可能有,许多同时到达的轴突,每个都可能通过不同的神经递质,产生不同的信号
It's much more a question of reminding you ; that if you can do it with this, you can do it with anything; but also of reminding you that, after all, reading--reading just anything--is a complex and potentially almost unlimited activity.
选择它主要是为了告诉你们,如果你能用理论来分析这篇,那么分析任何一篇都没问题;,还想提醒大家,阅读任何文章都是个复杂的过程,其中有无限种可能。
OK, great. So, most of you recognize that there are four different possibilities of there's four different electrons that can have those two quantum numbers.
K,大部分都认为,有4个不同的可能,有四个不同的电子可以有,这两个量子数。
As you may have guessed, because you have this on your handout, Milton is alluding here to the famous words of the Old Testament prophet Isaiah.
你们可能已经猜到了,因为讲义上都有,弥尔顿在这儿影射到这些,先知艾赛亚旧约里的一些很有名的词。
应用推荐