So according to Klawans, ritual purification involved separation from those aspects of humanity, death and sex, that are least God-like.

因此根据克洛文的理解，仪式的净化包括,和人性方面、死亡和性完全隔离开，这样和上帝最相像。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

And according to Klawans and others, ritual impurity arises from physical substances and states which are not in themselves sinful.

据克洛文和其他人所说，仪式的不洁是由自身有罪的,物质和状态引起的。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

We all know what was wrong with Croesus.

我们都知道克洛伊索斯错在了哪里

耶鲁公开课 - 古希腊历史简介课程节选

So Klawans argues, and I quote, that "sacrifice involves in part the controlled exercise of complete power over an animal's life and death."

因此克洛文认为，“献祭在某种程度上是一种,掌握动物生死的权力象征“

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

So Klawans argues that the process of sacrifice, which grants the offerer complete control over life and death, is a kind of imitatio dei.

因此克洛文认为献祭的过程，授予了实施者控制生杀的大权，实际上它就是一种对神的模仿。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

So he just says that there are really two organizing principles or overriding concerns in the Priestly traditions and the Priestly materials regarding sacrifice.

克洛文说，实际上在祭司的传说和有关文献中，关于献祭,有两个组成法则,或者说主要的关注点。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

So Klawans follows earlier scholars in suggesting that the rituals and sacrifices performed in this sanctuary were designed to ensure God's continued residence within and blessing of the community.

克洛文和一些早期的学者一样，认为,在圣所里进行宗教仪式献祭仪式,都是为了确保上帝长久地呆在这个地方,并祝福他的子民。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

So moral impurity is the second kind of impurity that's described by Klawans and others.

道德的不洁是克洛文和其他一些学者提到的,第二种不洁。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

But Klawans also asserts, and I quote, that "Imitatio dei does not exhaustively explain sacrifice in ancient Israel," and in fact, we should be surprised if any one single theory would indeed explain sacrifice.

但是克洛文同时也宣称，“模仿并不能完全地解释股以色列的献祭，“,事实上，如果有某个独立的理论真的解释了献祭,我们会十分惊讶。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

So Klawans notes in the article you read that the physical substances and states that are labeled impure and are therefore designated as antithetical to the realm of holiness are states that are associated with death on the one hand, and procreation on the other. Why should this be?

克洛文对你们现在读到的文章有过这样的说明,那些被贴上不洁标签,然后被认为和神圣的领域相对立的物质和状态,一方面来说都和死亡有关系，而另一方面和生殖有关，这是怎么回事呢？

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

He said, "If I cross the Halys River, that's the boundary between Lydia and Persia, what will happen?" The oracle replied, "A great empire will be destroyed," And Croesus said, "Terrific that's what I have in mind."

如果我跨过了哈吕斯河,那是吕底亚和波斯的分界线,会有什么后果,神谕回答说,一个伟大的帝国将被摧毁,于是克洛伊索斯说,太棒了,正如我愿

耶鲁公开课 - 古希腊历史简介课程节选

Well, the most famous early on, King Croesus of Lydia, the richest man in the world,you've heard all about him, decides it would be a nice thing to conquer the Persian Empire, his neighbor to the east.

最著名的就是吕底亚的克洛伊索斯国王,之前已经讲过,他是世上最富有的人,他觉得征服他东方的邻居,波斯帝国,是一个不错的事

耶鲁公开课 - 古希腊历史简介课程节选

The two are opposites. They are opposed and antagonistic towards one another. So Klawans points out, as you know, that there are three main sources of impurity in P.

它们是对立的，对立且相敌对,因此正如克洛文所指出的，在P中，有3个主要的不洁来源。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选