Yet Aristotle's conception of our political nature seems to require standards of justice that are natural or right for us.
但亚里士多德对我们政治天性的概念,似乎需要正义的标准,且那对我们是自然或正确的法治预设。
For me, when I'm doing assignments that require a lot of writing or you know,
对我来说,如果我做的项目需要大量的写作,
For your lifeblood I will surely require a reckoning; So if you are killed by a beast or a human, there will have to be a reckoning, an accounting.
你们的血;,无论你是被人或者兽所杀,我必将讨他的罪。
Moreover, the kids we have are vulnerable for long periods of time and require our resources.
而且,我们的孩子很长一段时间,易受伤害,我们需要保护它们。
The answer presumable is gonna be that the best version of the personality theory doesn't require item for item, having the very same believes, memories, desires and so forth.
可以揣测到的答案是,人格论最好的版本是,不去要求一丝不变,不要求,完全一样的信仰,记忆,渴望等等。
Natural right is mutable because different circumstances will require different kinds of decisions. So does this mean then that for Aristotle there are no universally valid ? standards of justice or right?
自然权利是易变的,因为不同的情况,将需要不同种的决策,这是否就意谓着亚里士多德,认为没有寰宇合法的,正义与权利标准?
应用推荐