-
Today you might say political scientists and social scientists they're more modest in ascribing priority to any particular branch of knowledge.
今日，你会说,政治科学家与社会科学家,较不敢将这种优先考虑,加到任何特定的。
-
But we all know do we not that most contemporary political scientists tend to be liberals. Their values are liberal values.
但我们都知道，不是吗？最当代的,政治科学家倾向于是自由主义者,其价值观是自由主义的价值观。
-
What most distinguishes Aristotle is that his language is addressed emphatically to citizens and statesmen not to other political scientists or philosophers. It has a public orientation.
亚里士多德最突出的地方是,他的语言明显地是指向公民与政治家,而非其它的政治科学家或哲学家,其倾向是公众，直接指向公众。
-
What are the questions that ? political scientists try to answer?
哪些问题,是政治科学家试图作答的？
-
Even while Aristotle may deny that there is a single method appropriate to the study of politics he proposes a set of common questions that political scientists have to address.
且总是时有变迁，虽然亚里士多德,可能否定有单一方法适合研究政治,但他却也提出一套通用的问题,政治科学家必需加以探讨。
-
Rather the great works provide us so to speak with a repository of fundamental or permanent questions that political scientists still continue to rely on in their work.
而不是靠巨著来回答,这么来说吧，大量基本或永恒的问题,同时也是政治科学家,仍持续在其著作中所倚赖的根本。
-
Aristotle takes his stand from within politics and the regime of which he is a part. Of course we all know contemporary political scientists are not neutral. They frequently insert their views values we call them value judgments we call them.
亚里士多德的立场却是置身于,政治与政体之内,让自己成为其中的一部份，当然,我们都知道当今的政治科学,并非如此中立，他们常硬加入,他们自身的观点与价值，他们的价值判断。
-
And of course the all important question even though political philosophers and political scientists rarely pronounce it ? namely quid sit deus what is God? Does he exist?
当然还有最重要的问题,就算是政治哲学家和,政治科学家都很难做出判断的问题,即quid，sit，deus？上帝是啥？祂存在吗？
应用推荐