But those human laws are only legitimate if they respect our natural rights, if they respect our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property.
但这些人类法律合法的唯一前提,就是尊重我们的自然权利,尊重我们不可剥夺的生命,自由和财产权。
Disappointment number two, once there is a legitimate government based on consent, the only limits for Locke are limits on arbitrary takings of life or of liberty or of property.
失望的第二点,一旦经过同意建立合法政府后,对洛克来说它唯一的限制,就是不能肆意夺取生命或自由或财产。
So you think that this is a defense, this defense of private property in land... Yes, because it complicates original acquisition If you only cite the arrival of foreigners that cultivated the land.
所以你认为他是在,为土地的私人所有作辩护吗。,是的,因为这复杂化了“最初占有“原则,如果只引用外国人到来并耕种土地这一例子的话。
应用推荐