• So we're allowing you to, for example, to hold the belief that it's equally likely that the goalie dives left or dives right.

    所以,打个比方,这里也可以包括,门将扑向左右两路概率相同的情况

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • And there is no belief you could possibly hold given these numbers in this game that could ever rationalize shooting the ball to the middle.

    在给出的这些数据下,无论你认为门将有多大概率会扑向右路,从中路射门绝对不是一个合理的选择

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • There is a necessary and inevitable tension between philosophy and belief or to put it another way between philosophy and the civic pieties that hold the city together.

    所以紧张关系必然,且无可避免地存在于哲学与信念之间,或换句话说,介于哲学与维系全城的公民虔诚间。

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • It's natural to talk that way, but if we want belief in the soul to help us hold out the possibility at least that there might be life after death, then I think we need to actually say that strictly speaking, it's not that a person is a soul plus a body.

    这说起来很轻松,如果我们想要寄托于,相信灵魂的存在,而让死后能够继续活着有据可依,那么我们需要一个严格的说法,不是说一个人是灵魂加肉体

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Is that right? So no: to say it another way, middle is not a best response to any belief I can hold about the goal keeper, to any belief.

    我说的没错吧,或者换个说法,从中路射门无论在何种信念下,都不是一个最佳对策

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Most of us most of the time hold these beliefs as a matter of faith as a matter of belief because we have learned about them from childhood because they were written by Thomas Jefferson or some other reputed high authority.

    大部份的人一向将这些信念,奉为信仰,信条,因为我们从小,就是这样受教育,也因为它们是由托马斯?杰斐逊,及其它著名权贵所写。

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定