He doesn't make the claim about the general utility of freedom or unlimited speech.

他并未主张自由的,一般实用或是无限言论；

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

How are we to understand this case ? about toleration and freedom of speech?

我们如何了解这件,关于容忍与言论自由的范例？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Why can't you, we live in a democratic society with freedom of speech.

我们生活在个有言论自由的民主社会。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

If we're arguing about hate speech, we could talk about the balance between the rights of the freedom of speech versus the right to a certain quality of education free of harassment and humiliation.

如果我们围线仇恨言论来争辩，我们就会谈到如何平衡,言论自由的权利,与接受高等教育,不受骚扰和羞辱的权利。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

My first book was on the trial of John Peter Zenger, 5 which was the first famous case in America in 1735 relating to freedom of speech.

我首本书写的就是John，Peter，Zenger审判，这个案例在1785年的美国家喻户晓5,是言论自由方面的第一个例子。

普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

How far should freedom of speech and that is to say speech that borders on, even verges into, civic impiety, ? how far should such speech be tolerated?

言论自由的界限,确切的说是临界言论，甚至是跨界谈到公民渎神的言论，这类言论的容忍界限为何？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Is a healthy society ? one that is literally open to every point of view, ? freedom of speech is naturally a cherished good, ? is it the supreme good?

健全的社会,基本上就是对各种观点持开放态度吗，言论自由本质上就是好的，或它是最好？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

His in other words seems to be a highly personal in many ways highly individual quest for self perfection and not a doctrine about the value of freedom of speech in general.

换言之，他崇高的个人,从许多层面来看，是他崇高的个人,追求本身完美，而非关一般,言论自由价值的学说。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选