No, I'm inclined to think that that other bold claim, on the other side, is probably mistaken as well.

不，我倾向于认为另一个大胆的观点，在另一方面，可能也是错误的。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Well, here we're going to have, of course, more modest and more bold versions of the valuable container theory.

当然这时候出现了，较保守和较激进的有价值容器理论。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

That is bold. The great creator raised his plastic arm, right?

这很大胆，造物主举起了他“强有力的手“不是吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

And--or people would talk to him and he'd just stare at them and say--and people would say-- would be intimidated by his bold and impetuous stare when actually he just totally didn't know anything.

别人跟他说话，他就会盯着人看,人们就会-,被他大胆无礼的凝视吓怕,其实他根本不知道别人在说什么。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

If we got 1, 2 and 3, we are entitled to the bold conclusion.

如果我们有了前提1，2和，我们有资格得出大胆的结论。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I'm not inclined to believe that the bold claim is right.

我并不倾向于相信这个大胆的观点是正确的。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

That would be the bold claim to make at this point.

这就是在这一点上能做出的大胆的观点。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Well, that would be a rather bold claim.

那会是个相当大胆的观点。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

suppose we make for, the moment, the bold conjecture, the philosophical claim, that not only is pleasure and the absence of pain, not only is pleasure one good thing and pain one bad thing.

假设此刻我们做出大胆猜测，哲学声称，不仅只,快乐和没有痛苦，快乐不止是一样好的东西，痛苦不止是一样坏的东西。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Iser's understanding of gapping the spark plug is a much more bold affirmative of the imaginative powers of the reader, a much more bold process than the hesitant conservative process suggested by Gadamer.

伊瑟尔火花塞间隙的见解,更加肯定读者的能力，比葛达玛倡导的保守程序,更加大胆。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

A bold claim would say, "Yes."

一个大胆的观点是“是的“

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

A bold claim would say, "The facts about death, if I thought about them, would change my behavior, but not because it would give me a reason to change my behavior-- " simply because it would influence my behavior."

一个大胆的观点会认为，“关于死亡的事实，如果我考虑了它们，就会改变我的行为，但不是因为它给了我改变行为的理由-,只是因为它影响了我的行为“

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选