So,composition alone can't give you the answer to the question why is the plywood superior to the solid pine board?

只用组成成分无法解答,这个问题,为什么胶合板要优于松木板呢？

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

You can answer to this question, someone says, "Well, what are you doing? Are you still here at school?"

当有人问你，“嗯……你在做什么呢？你还在学校吗？”你就可以回答了，

I'm about to 课堂 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

STUDENT: Right, we're going to do that in a second, but the answer is Fibonacci numbers, we define the first two.

学生：听不见：,我们马上会试一试，但是答案是斐波那契数列，我们可以定义下最初的两个数。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

The semiotician's answer to this is it never could have happened simply as an act of agency, as an act of will.

符号学者这样解释,这不是一己之力的结果。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

And just as a fun aside, we also realized as computer scientists that sometimes technology is not the answer.

抛开趣味性不提，我们意识到作一个,计算机科学家来说技术,并不是我们要的最终答案。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

So that would probably be de Broglie's answer for why, in fact, we're not observing the wavelength behavior of material on a day-to-day life.

所以那就可能是德布罗意关于,为什么我们无法再日常生活中,观测到物质的波动行为的答案。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

I hope you enjoy using Star Festival and do let me know the questions that you are trying to answer.

事情，我希望你使用“七夕“愉快并让我了解,你想找出答案的那些问题。

麻省理工公开课 - 媒体、教育、市场课程节选

This seems like a completely Christian answer to Zooey's problem, and we're back on the horns of that dilemma.

这似乎是左伊问题的基督教的回答，我们又回到了两难的境地了。

耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

I think the answer may involve the possibility that at the beginning of the poem, there simply wasn't a clear distinction between the poet and the speaker.

答案可能包括了,在诗歌的开头,根本就没有一个清晰的区分的可能性。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

There's a Midterm. That will be a short answer test that's intended to give you a chance to show how diligently you've been reading and coming to class.

我们会有一个期中考，会有一张简答问卷,目的是能够让你们表现出,你们的勤劳，用功阅读和按时上课。

耶鲁公开课 - 现代诗歌课程节选

And the reason they're unavoidable, the reason they're inescapable is that we live some answer to these questions every day.

它们之所以无可避免，无法回避,是因为在日常生活中，我们一次次地在回答这些问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

Nobody knows, but there's a theory which won't answer your question but will put it into a broader context.

没有人知道答案,但有这么个理论,它无法回答你的问题,但却能让你从更宽广的视角来看这个问题

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

Answer! I want an answer.

答案！我想要一个答案！

普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

In political philosophy it is never a sufficient answer to answer a question with a statement " "because Plato says so " " or "because Nietzsche says so."

对于政治哲学而言,答案永远都嫌不充足,无法仅用一段陈述来回答一个问题,“因为柏拉图如是说“,“因为尼采如是说“

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

We'll try to raise them with all the technologies, we won't try to answer them, there are probably better people at Yale to answer those kinds of questions than I am.

我们会将其与有关技术共同提出,但是这里我不会给出解决方法,或许在耶鲁大学有其他专家,更擅长这些问题

耶鲁公开课 - 生物医学工程探索课程节选

Now the answer seems to me, the only answer I can imagine Socrates and Plato are giving at this point is to say, look, I need a different 3 definition of invisible, not 2 but 3.

我认为答案是，我所能想到的唯一答案是,在这点上苏格拉底和柏拉图,给出的答案是，我需要一个,无形的不同定义，不是2而是。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选