Bad things can happen, so it's really, really hard to just focus on getting things right and not winning the argument.

坏事情总会发生，所以要想将精力,集中于把事情做好,而不是去赢得这场争论真的很难。

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

All right. The creativity argument may not work, but there's something that sort of immediately comes on its heels.

这些关于创造力的观点或许行不通,但是有些东西,随之而来

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

All right, who would like to respond to that ... argument about democracy being Okay, up there. Stand up.

好的，谁愿意来回应他的观点,认为民主,好的，那里，请起立。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

If you did that, on some level, I think, you were absolutely right, even though you were utterly misconstruing the logic of the argument.

如果你那么做了，我认为在某种程度上你们是绝对正确的,即使你们完全理解错了这论证里面的逻辑。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

All right, so that's a weak argument, but in fact, it's a way of suggesting, probably not.

这是一种提议，可能是错的，好了，那我们对一个列表。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

Convincing argument; right?

很令人信服的说法，对吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

Since they are sentient, free creatures, they should have a right to do whatever they want unless there is a compelling argument against it and a compelling argument would have to involve some infringement of the freedom of other people.

因为他们都是有知觉的自由个体，他们有权做他们想做的事,除非有非常强烈的理由反对他们这么做,而这种强烈的理由是指,这种行为会侵害另一个人的自由。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

It's a question of saying, "How on earth would you ever have the concept 'heterosexual' if you didn't have the concept 'homosexual' in place?" Right? The absolute interdependency of these concepts is, again, central to her argument and to her understanding of things.

这就像是说，如果首先没有“同性恋“这个概念,又怎么会有“异性恋“这个概念呢’,是吧，这些概念的绝对依赖性，是她论点的中心，同时也是她理解事物的中心轴。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

My argument must be wrong because it goes against the lesson of the class and the lessons of the class are gospel right, they're not wrong ever, so what's wrong with that argument? Yes, Ale Well because you have to be able to agree, you have to be able to speak to them but we aren't allowed to show our partners what we wrote.

这个说法肯定有问题,因为这和我们的结论刚好背道而驰,结论是绝对正确的,结论没错,那这个说法错在哪,艾尔,因为你必须要能够达成一致,你需要和他们谈判,但是我们不允许同伴看到我的选择

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So here's a program called Arg V, this is fancy speak for argument Vector, a list of arguments for the left or right.

这里有一个叫做ArgV的程序，这个设想讲述了,参数矢量，从左到右的一列参数。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Milton Friedman makes this argument- All right, so Bill Gates can give to charity if he wants to.

弥尔顿·弗里德曼提出-,你是说，如果盖茨愿意，可以给慈善机构捐款。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

Well,this is an argument--at least it seems to me-- that has some chance of being right.

这种论点，至少对我来说-,还是有可能成立的。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

All right. So the next question is, is the argument from recollection a good one?

那么下一个问题是,回忆论是否是无懈可击的呢

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

All right. That's the argument from free will.

这就是从自由意志得出的论证

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Although this is a form of an argument that Plato does put forward in other dialogues as well, and so it strikes me so there's at least some reason to think this is an argument that he felt might well be right.

由于这个型相的论点,柏拉图在其他的对话录里也提到过,所以这令我觉得他可能,觉得这个论点可以成立

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

As I say,I'm not sure whether that argument's right.

正如我说，我不确定这个论点是否正确。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

This argument,I think,has some possibility of being right.

这个论点我认为有可能是对的。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

If we could find the right F, and make out the argument, the physicalist can't explain it or does a bad job of explaining it and the dualist does a better job of explaining it, we'd have reason to believe in the soul.

如果我们能找到合适的特性F,并且给出论证,物理主义者无法解释,或者解释得很牵强,而二元论的解释更合理,那么我们就有理由相信有灵魂存在

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选